patching...
Update: The next chapter of your community's story begins with a single voice. Yours. Blog on Patch. »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Voters OK Medical Marijuana Zoning, School Budget

The annual town meeting approved all articles except the last one, a citizen petition.

 

Westborough's annual town meeting Saturday approved the school committee's budget request over two lower figures.

Voters also approved the planning board's proposed zoning bylaw amendment regulating medical marijuana treatment and dispensing facilities, as well as marijuana cultivation.

And voters approved the municipal building committee's request to borrow $7,354,063 to renovate Westborough Town Hall.

Voters approved 16 of the 17 warrant articles.

Only a citizen petition to limit Westborough's tax rate increase for fiscal years 2015 and 2016 failed to pass during the session, which was held in the Westborough High School auditorium.

The petition was the last order of business before the town meeting ended at 10:36 p.m.

Westborough Patch will have more town meeting coverage over the next few days.

Related Topics: March 16 annual town meeting and westborough

Stephen Faris

3:56 pm on Sunday, March 17, 2013

Folks,
Once again the small minority hijacked the Town Meeting and pushed up the spending. I can only conclude the majority of Westborough Voters are apathetic and ignorant of the bloated spending.

Where are the 11000 voters? It time to look at new forms of government because this Town does not have Democracy. It is tyranny of the minority.

Steve Faris

Reply

John Rice

8:38 pm on Sunday, March 17, 2013

Mr. Faris, YOU are the "small minority." You just lost an election for the Board of Selectmen by a landslide. Every position you advocated for at Town Meeting yesterday lost (as they did at the last Town Meeting). Just because you -- like anyone else -- can post your uninformed ramblings on this free website does not make you "a leader." It just means you have too much time on your hands.

Please stop wasting working people's time, particularly our Town employees' time. Our taxpayer dollars pay Town employees' salaries so that they can deal with real issues facing our town -- not the ridiculous, time-sink nonsense you keep raising, like the silly citizen's petition that got struck down yesterday that would have had absolutely no legal effect even if it had gotten passed. STOP WASTING OTHER PEOPLE'S TIME.

If you are interested in making a difference in the world, please go volunteer somewhere. It would be a much better way to spend your time.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Stephen Faris

10:40 pm on Sunday, March 17, 2013

I suggest you stop wasting your time lecturing me.

Comment_arrow

Dominic Capriole

10:39 pm on Monday, March 18, 2013

John Rice is not a name that is in the list of residents of Westborough. Please identify yourself correctly. You did not understand article 17. It was not intended to have a legal effect, it was intended to have a behavioral effect. Tell us what would have been the effect of my motion if it had been passed. Particularly which Town employees' time is wasted by the exercise of free speech.

Will Z

5:23 pm on Monday, March 18, 2013

Dear Rubber Stampers (PART1),

Now we have some of the highest tax rates in the state of Massachusetts and what do we get for it? Is the education of the our kids in Westborough really any better than other towns?

Jennifer, you mentioned people don't want to "reduce town services." Are you kidding me!? What are you getting for your taxes? or More importantly what are you NOT getting from your taxes when compared to other towns?

Town Trash pickup? Fantastic Parks? I don't think so.

Let me guess, the quality of teachers must be far better than other towns too, right? I would hope the teachers get 'graded' on their performance as well. Far too often have I seen and heard teachers comments at a local bar, on Facebook, and other forums about the wariness of their job. Stop complaining, it is embarrassing. You are some of the highest paid teachers in the state with superior benefits as well. By the way, this is all public knowledge; I encourage everyone to look it up. You might be surprised at what some of "quality" teachers get paid. - people wake up!

How are raises evaluated for the school? By quality of work and merit or tenure?
How many kids are in a single class?
How many school administrators do we really need collectively?

Reply

Will Z

5:24 pm on Monday, March 18, 2013

Dear Rubber Stampers (PART2),

Let's look at town positions as well: Town Departments, DPW, etc. Stop complaining. How much do you pay for your medical insurance premiums? Co-pays, etc when compared to the people paying taxes in this town. Again, stop complaining.

A few meetings back after Ms. Emery and others decided condescend voters who were asking for more information and time to analyze other options to use the existing firehouse rather than build a new firehouse. The smartest thing I heard was when one man stood up asking the Selectmen, "You have known that a new firehouse would be needed over 15 years ago, what steps have you taken to save for this?"

I met a disabled veteran in town who is so distraught over our increased taxes, he may move from town. He told me he is considered 60% disabled by the Department of Veteran's Affairs after suffering injuries while serving our country. He informed me that the town allows only a $500 discount on his real estate tax bill. Why aren't we (the town) allowing disabled veteran's tax discounts commensurate with the disability they have incurred?

Do you see where things are backwards? I certainly do.

Reply

Will Z

5:25 pm on Monday, March 18, 2013

Dear Rubber Stampers (PART3),

So, Mr. Faris is angry, right? So what, right? Mr. Faris is ANGRY and I don't blame him...at least he is trying to do something different. Nobody seems to be looking for creative ways to ever save money, consolidate, or do more with less. It is more with more in this town...it's a joke...and YOU know it. This is why you have disparaging remarks and condescending cutdowns to Mr. Faris. It is so evident at the meetings and in this forum.

Keep voting without regard or better yet neglect to vote at all. The town loves mindless sheeple.

W.Z.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Stephen Faris

3:26 pm on Wednesday, March 20, 2013

Willard,
I thank you for your support. Well stated comments and I believe over 400 voters would agree.

Steve Faris

Comment_arrow

Csharris

6:52 pm on Wednesday, March 20, 2013

Steve
Why do you keep referring to the 400 people? THEY DIDN'T SHOW UP TO TOWN MEETING!

Patch_comments_icon

Michael Gelbwasser

5:40 pm on Monday, March 18, 2013

A request to the group: please stop the personal attacks, name calling, etc. Some great points have been made here that could've easily been made without the digs.

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Michael Gelbwasser

6:32 pm on Monday, March 18, 2013

I've just deleted a comment that was off-topic.

Reply

Andy Koenigsberg

9:24 am on Tuesday, March 19, 2013

I disagree that a few voters hijacked the meeting. If the 400 or so people who voted for Mr. Farris during the last election had all come to Town Meeting, the outcome perhaps might have been different on several issues. So the question I ask is why didn't the people who agreed with Mr. Farris' positions come to Town Meeting?

Westborough may have gotten too large for the current form of government but any form of government still requires informed voters and people interested enough to be part of the political process one way or another.

Let's say we go to a Town Council with members elected from our precincts. Voters still have to know which candidates represent their positions. Heck, there have to be enough candidates to fill the vacant positions. Elected members would have to take the time to keep their precincts informed and take input from them on various issues.

I would hazard a guess that the same people who show up to Town Meeting would be the same people who would either become candidates for Town Council or be the ones to consistently give feedback to their council members. The net result might not be any different than Town Meeting.

So the bottom line will be as it always is - if you have a position that you feel strongly about - it is incumbent upon you to rally like-minded people to get involved. Either get them to come to town meeting or get them to vote for you in Town Council or any other representative system that might be adopted.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Stephen Faris

1:45 pm on Wednesday, March 20, 2013

Andy,
I see you finally caught on to my strategy. However, if people feel it is useless trying, they wont participate. That is the case presently. I hope we can change that.
Right now we have a broken system and almost any effort to achieve balance will get many votes.

Mike

11:54 am on Tuesday, March 19, 2013

The meeting was hijacked by the voters that did not show up for the meeting. Fifty percent of the room leaving after the school vote probably had more impact on the remaining articles than the people who stayed and voted.

The final attendance numbers for town meeting were approximately ten percent of the number of people voting in the last election. Those election results may have been considered light but it shows a preference over a town meeting format by a substantial number.

A shift to an electronic ballot vote may be the change required to convince people to become more involved in the process and not just the final vote.

Reply

Csharris

11:57 am on Tuesday, March 19, 2013

Saturday town meeting from 1 to 10:40 isn't appealing to most people. It's broken and there needs to be change.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Andy Koenigsberg

3:17 pm on Tuesday, March 19, 2013

Frankly, I don't know if any time slot is appealing. Town Meeting was shifted to mid March from mid May in the hope that a rainy/cold day would be less likely to distract residents than a warm sunny day later in the year.

Democracy takes work and interest, regardless of the form it takes. That's been my point all along.

Csharris

4:05 pm on Tuesday, March 19, 2013

I agree however a person that works 5-6 days a week just isn't going to show whereas a senior views a Saturday like every other day. If we had representative town meeting people may have a reason to become interested. Obviously this is far from changing. We New Englanders are a tough group to change tradition and the way things are done!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Andy Koenigsberg

5:24 pm on Tuesday, March 19, 2013

It would be no small task to change the structure of our town government and would require . . . lots of particpation and/or dedication of several committed individuals.

Barring that (and I say this with tongue firmly in cheek and not directed at any individual in particular) - suck it up cupcake, this is the system we have, so deal with it.

Dominic Capriole

11:16 am on Wednesday, March 20, 2013

And I say to you "by any means necessary". Jean Paul Sartre

Reply
Comment_arrow

Andy Koenigsberg

11:59 am on Wednesday, March 20, 2013

And I'll tell you the same thing I told Steve Farris over a year ago. Have at it.

BTW - Not that I am a fan of European playwrights, but by not using "by any means necessary" quote in context, you are totally missing the point:

"I was not the one to invent lies: they were created in a society divided by class and each of us inherited lies when we were born. It is not by refusing to lie that we will abolish lies: it is by eradicating class by any means necessary."

It was from a Satre play called "Dirty Hands" which was about the justification for committing a political assasination.

So what in heck does your out of context quote have to do with how Westborough voted at town meeting? Are you advocating non-democratic means of achieving your ends?

Dominic Capriole

4:48 pm on Wednesday, March 20, 2013

It is Sartre. You do not understand the quote which is generally considered to leave open all available tactics for the desired ends, with the "necessary" qualifier acting as a caveat. Expand your definition of class and then think of the societal (taxation) conflict in Westborough. Observe the behavior of others.
BTW - "Dirty Hands" is based mainly on the theme of existentialism. The plot is just a vehicle.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Andy Koenigsberg

2:09 pm on Friday, March 22, 2013

You did not answer my question. Are you advocating non-democratic means of achieving your ends? Further if so, what are those means? You have been making the same arguments for the last two years and very few people are buying it, so what's your next move?

Patch_comments_icon

Michael Gelbwasser

4:56 pm on Friday, March 22, 2013

I've deleted a number of comments that were personal attacks, on both sides. If anyone feels I've missed some, e-mail me. Comments need to be about the issues discussed at town meeting, not the intelligence of the people discussing them.

Reply

Leave a comment